[gvttc general] Monday League Stats

[Alex Khazanov]

I need a #2 sub for tomorrow
Alex Khazanov

On Sun, Mar 13, 2022, 6:54 PM Chris Fisher via gvttc.general <
gvttc.general at gvttc.com> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> Unforcanutly as some of you have noticed the stats from last were not
> correct. Last week they showed multiple people with Zero wins which was not
> correct. Just to give a quick history lesson, the excel program that is
> used for the league was created back in 1999 (numerous modifications have
> been done since then) and is showing signs of its age. Not only has the
> Monday league had problems but the Wednesday league has as well which also
> is using the same excel program. The Tuesday League uses a different excel
> program since they only have 3 players per Team and play best of 7 games.
> This program works with only 36 people in the league.  While the Monday &
> Wednesday leagues can have more players and  have 4 players per Team and
> play best of 5 games.
>
>
>
> This week, when trying to get the stats the below is happening when
> caculationing Table 4. Not sure why, but I’m the last person on this planet
> that can get into excel at the Marcos level and correct this. If anyone
> can, please contact me directly or tomorrow at RSG. I have already reached
> out to some people but with out any luck on fixing the issue.  Below are
> the screen shots of the issue. When clicking on the “Debug”, it’s showing
> the error is in the Marcos, but nothing has changed or been rewritten, so I
> don’t know why its happening. Going back to prior excels from a few weeks
> back yielded the same results.  So, unless this can get corrected, we will
> only be able to have Rating Central updated and have to
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Now – For some good news…… A new program has been in the works for a
> little while and will be used for the next league.  I’m going to changed
> the last Ladder Week (3/21) to a Team Week. Team 1 will still have a Bye.
> These issues will NOT affect Rating Central.  Rating Central has been
> update to included last week.
>
>
>
>
>
> Sorry about this, I’m just as disappointed as you are. Thanks for your
> understanding.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> gvttc.general mailing list
> gvttc.general at gvttc.com
> list info:http://www.gvttc.com/gen_list_info
> archives: http://www.gvttc.com/gen_list_archives
> unsubscribe: http://www.gvttc.com/gen_list_unsubscribe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist3.pair.net/pipermail/gvttc.general/attachments/20220313/92d9a5bd/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 939D161AC7DD4C24908989A1EAEDA501.png
Type: image/png
Size: 162567 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist3.pair.net/pipermail/gvttc.general/attachments/20220313/92d9a5bd/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 77BD61D0111D4870BB7AF74294E9004B.png
Type: image/png
Size: 135805 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist3.pair.net/pipermail/gvttc.general/attachments/20220313/92d9a5bd/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 77BD61D0111D4870BB7AF74294E9004B.png
Type: image/png
Size: 135805 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist3.pair.net/pipermail/gvttc.general/attachments/20220313/92d9a5bd/attachment-0005.png>