[TDA_announce] TDA in IAU

[Patricia Whitelock]

Rob

I agree with Virginia, Knox etc

Many thanks to you for continuing this despite the setback.
We should look at Working group in "Data & Documentation" with links to 
other divisions.

It is also worth asking the GS for a list of "experts" that were not 
represented in our proposal.

Regards
Patricia



On 25/04/2015 00:00, Knox Long wrote:
> First, Rob, I think all of us should thank you and others who led this 
> effort for the work and time you have put into the proposal .
>
> Second, I thought the decision was a horrible one, given how rapidly 
> this field is growing and how international it is in scope.
>
> Third, I agree with Virginia it is better to be in the IAU than out, 
> and that a WG is the best available option
>
> Cheers,
> Knox
>
> !DSPAM:553ac12f13681470313417!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TDA_announce mailing list
> TDA_announce at timedomainastronomy.net
> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/tda_announce
>
>
> !DSPAM:553ac12f13681470313417!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist3.pair.net/pipermail/tda_announce/attachments/20150425/43c1899c/attachment.html>